Leuchtturm1917 as a BuJo, vs Muji’s spiral notebook, and other BuJo-related thoughts.

I’ve been using the Leuchtturm1917 A5 notebook as my bullet journal for more than four months now. I feel that’s enough time for an objective and thorough review.

Leuchtturm1917 A5 Hardcover in Berry.
Leuchtturm1917 A5 Hardcover Dotted Ruling in Berry. AKA, my current BuJo.

But first, a bit of context.

I had loved using Muji’s A5 double-ring notebooks as my bullet journal. Loved it so much, in fact, that I would go through 2-3 notebooks a year. It wasn’t economical and it was a pain to have to transfer notes so often. Obviously 70 sheets wasn’t enough.

Muji Recycle Paper Double-ring Dot Grid Notebook - A5
Muji’s Recycled High-Quality Paper Ring Dot A5 Notebook. Aside from being a mouthful, they’re BuJo #s 1 to 3. I kind of miss that cover. It worked great as a canvas.

And so I found myself in need of a new notebook that had more pages. Leuchtturm1917 often came up as a recommendation, so I decided to give it a try.

Now in order for my review to make sense, it’s important I establish the way I… bullet my journal. BuJo notebook reviews tend to be subjective as the whole bullet journal system is open to interpretation.

So how do I use my BuJo? In a word, UTILITARIAN.

I do not use it for art. I do not use it for journaling. I don’t even use it for long-term planning (at least, not much). My bullet journal is a series of daily to-do lists. Whatever I list there then gets scheduled into my Outlook calendar. I may have the occasional text like notes and minutes dumped in there, usually out of convenience.

If you use your BuJo in a similar way, then you’ll be able to make the most out of this review.

That established, let’s start off with the good points shall we?

The Positives

  • LOTS of pages. This was the primary reason why I switched from Muji in the first place. At 249 pages, that’s more than 3.5x the writing space Muji ever offered. I started on this notebook on the 1st of October last year, and I’m still on page 104–just a little over 40%.
  • Numbered pages. All the sheets are pre-paginated. No need to manually write down the page number! And what a time-saver for indices!
Leuchtturm1917 Numbered Pages.
Leuchtturm1917 numbered pages. All that pre-paginated glory.
  • Dotted or Dot-grid Ruling. The Leuchtturm1917 comes in four possible paper rulings:
    • Ruled (your average notebook)
    • Squared (that math notebook you never used properly)
    • Plain (aaarrrrrrrtttttttt), and
    • Dotted (the queen to rule them all).

    Dotted is my ruling of choice. It isn’t as common in other brands so I’m quite pleased Leuchtturm1917 offers it.

  • Sturdy Packaging. The notebook comes in a hardcover which means it can deal with a bit of wear and tear. I didn’t know how important this was to me until my older Muji cardboard covers started to fray at the corners.
  • Elastic enclosure band. Same as Muji, there’s a simple band that helps keep the pages in place. Leuchtturm1917’s seems to be sturdier though.
  • Stickers for labeling and archiving. Someone had once asked how was I going to tell my three Muji bullet journals apart. I don’t have an answer to that yet, but for Leuchtturm1917 at least, it comes with sticker labels for the cover and spine.
  • Colors. Available in 21 colors, there’s a lot of room for personalization. As I love pink I had my pick between the colors “New Pink” and “Berry”.

The Negatives

  • $$$.  Leuchtturm1917 is expensive, there’s no going around about it. One of their selling points is how it, “stands for premium quality in more than 50 countries.
    $20 for a notebook is definitely a premium. Locally, its priced at P1,200 (almost $23) at National Bookstore.
  • Limited availability.  Even though its available locally, stocks are limited especially the dot grid kind. It’s so bad, actually, that I had to get family to buy mine from the US.
  • Table of contents (ToC). This is one of the most subjective points in this review. The way I use my BuJo requires an index rather than a ToC, so I find the three pages Leuchtturm1917 dedicated to the latter useless.

    Leuchtturm1917 Table of Contents
    Leuchtturm1917’s table of contents, of which it has three pages for, when all I wanted was a good old index page.
  • You can’t tear off pages. The pages are thread-bound, so if you detach a page you may end up ruining the notebook’s binding. The notebook does come with 8 perforated and detachable sheets, but I’ve already used all of them up.

Neutral, but possibly important, points

  • Gusseted pocket. If you’re like me and don’t know what “gusseted” means, I’ll save you that Google trip and tell you it’s an inner pocket. The pocket contains: stickers, an information booklet, and a thank you note (aww). I can imagine this pocket would be useful for art journalers to keep scraps in, but I haven’t found a use for it yet.
  • Thin paper. Fountain pen users beware! The paper, while smooth, is very thin. Like I-can-almost-read-what-I-wrote-in-the-back-level of thin. It won’t be able to handle fountain pens, heavier inks, and most especially paints. I just use ballpoint pens so this isn’t a deal-breaker for me.
  • Two bookmarks. I just need one bookmark–to tell me where’s my most recent page–so I find the second bookmark excessive. Your usage may vary.

In Conclusion

For my utilitarian purposes, the Leuchtturm1917 makes for a pretty great bullet journal. My biggest gripe is the lack of an index, but I can live with it.

The cost hurts. But considering the Muji notebooks I was using weren’t that cheap either, I can justify the price. Your budget may vary and there are definitely a lot of cheaper alternatives out there.

There’s also an official Leuchtturm1917 Bullet Journal, a collaboration with the original BuJo designer. It costs around $5 more, and from what I’ve seen the changes aren’t worth it. About the only advantage is that it uses a proper index rather than a table of contents–my biggest gripe, but not worth the extra dollars.

I’ve gotten a few recommendations around other notebooks, particularly cheaper ones, but as I’m not even halfway through I’m in no hurry to test them. Realistically, I’m likely to stick with the Leuchtturm1917 unless it runs out of stock again.


Farnam Street Course: The Art of Focus, a review

UPDATE: The Art of Focus course is now closed.

How do you learn to focus?

We don’t need to be reminded about the importance of focus. But if its so important, why is it so hard to learn how?

There’s a lot of material out there claiming to teach you how. Anywhere from psychology, self-improvement books, to Lifehacker.

Which one actually works?

As part of Project 2017 (i.e. Continuously improve myself throughout the year, through a series of sprints ), I set out to learn how to focus in six weeks.

Given the deadline I didn’t want to waste my time sifting through all the options, so I decided to just pay someone to teach me

After a bit of research, I narrowed it down to two choices:

  1. Farnam Street’s The Art of Focus
  2. Shawn Blanc’s The Focus Course


How I heard about these focus classes

I’ve been a regular reader of the Farnam Street blog for a while. I firmly believe Shane Parrish (the original blogger behind Farnam Street) and his team have some of the best content in the web. From books to the pursuit of wisdom, Farnam Street writes about things I truly care about.

Through his blog he mentioned the FS courses, one of which was The Art of Focus.

In Shawn Blanc’s case, he had featured in some of Sean Wes’s videos and podcasts back in December where he talked about the Focus Course he was developing. Sean was a big fan: he recommended the course to his subscribers, even offering a discount.

Sean Wes, in case you aren’t aware, has a huge online presence. Getting a plug like that is practically guaranteed revenue.


Why Farnam

So why did I go with Farnam Street? Even if it had no discounts? And so few reviews?

Because it’s Farnam.

Before The Focus Course, I had never heard of Shawn Blanc. I didn’t know if he was any good aside from the selected testimonials on his landing page.

On the other hand I’ve been a longtime reader of the Farnam Street Blog. I can attest to the quality of the content. But I didn’t know if this quality translated to the courses.

I came to the conclusion that even if the course doesn’t work for me, I can consider the course fee as a form of donation to the fantastic blog.


So was it worth the money?

Its hard to quantify if the course fee was worth it. Doing so would mean putting a dollar amount to my hours, and that I have a baseline to compare against.

I don’t.

But I will admit I learned a lot.

If you’ve read Cal Newport’s Deep Work, much of the material in The Art of Focus course is based there. What the course offers is a structured way to execute the material from the book.

I had enrolled in the course before reading the book, so much of the content was new to me.

Now that I’ve read the book, I wish I had done it the other way around: I felt I should have had context first (something the book does well) before being taught the plan (something the course does well).

One big con is that the course felt very much one-way. i.e., Shane explains, you absorb. There was no feedback mechanism to tell if you’re headed in the right direction. Maybe that was the idea behind logging your hours (one of the steps Shane implements in the course), but it didn’t work for me.

I felt annoyed considering I thought I had paid for a course, not just content.

But as I said earlier, I had gone into the course with the mindset that the money was a donation to the blog, rather than the fee for the course. I couldn’t stay annoyed for very long.

Especially since the material itself—whether it was Farnam’s or Newport’s–was good.


Would I recommend?

So in spite of all my complaints, I would recommend The Art of Focus if:

  1. You are looking for a structured way to execute the strategies taught in Deep Work.
  2. You are very much a self-learner and do not expect interaction nor feedback.
  3. You learn well through videos.

That last one was a doozy. Most of the material is delivered through videos–a miss for someone with poor hearing like myself. Shane does offer transcripts, but I’d appreciate subtitles more as transcripts don’t allow me to view the video content at the same time.

I guess I should be thankful it wasn’t something like podcasts, or else I’d demand a refund.


Key takeaways

Much of the content of the Art of Focus is based on Deep Work, so its difficult to say who was the source for which takeaway.

I did notice that the Art of Focus gave a lot more err, focus, to these topics:

  1. Attention residue
  2. Meditation

Which is why I’m finding that, even without implementing the other Deep Work strategies, just addressing these two have already made a significant impact.

The latter especially, as I’ve never really meditated and assumed it was something only yogi do.

The course seems to assume you already know how to meditate though, so I had to look up elsewhere to learn how. FYI, the Headspace app is great, but lately I’ve been using Smiling Mind.

I’m considering re-doing the course again in a few months, maybe even next year, now that I’ve finished Deep Work. I’ll give myself more time to digest the content before I start implementing such structure again.

Wait, other people can take your time?

Imagine if anyone could just take some money out of your bank account when they needed it. Time’s more valuable than money, yet that’s exactly what people are doing with other people’s time.

If your time is for the taking, you’re working at a crazy company.

Imagine if anyone could just take some money out of your bank account when they needed it. Time’s more valuable than money, yet that’s exactly what people are doing with other people’s time.

–Jason Fried, Wait, other people can take your time?



Great post from Signal v. Noise this week. Jason talks us through how calendars work at  Basecamp (HINT: It’s drastically different from the shared calendars we consider the norm).

I suggest reading the post that initiated this one as well: When Jason shared what his calendar looked like.

I measured my productivity for a month. Here’s what I learned.

I’m not a morning person.

Given the choice, I’d rather sleep in and work after lunch. Like most people though, I don’t have that choice.

But am I under-performing because my brain isn’t fully awake yet?

I have a typical 9 to 5 job. I often come in earlier to accommodate my global team’s timezone differences (but offset by leaving early as well). I’d come in all bleary-eyed, head floating in the clouds, rushing to get my first shot of caffeine.

At one point I questioned,

Am I under-performing because my brain isn’t fully awake yet? Am I selling myself short just because I’m forcing myself to work against what’s natural?

I asked a few colleagues and even my manager, and they assured me I wasn’t under-performing at all.

Paranoid as I am though, I decided to put numbers to my feelings so I could make some logical analyses.

For 3 to 4 weeks I measured my productivity, hour by hour, by evaluating my energy, focus, and motivation with a number between 1 to 10.

I limited myself to weekdays because I knew my weekends were too spontaneous to measure. I also wrote little notes to give context to my scores, such as “drank coffee” or “back-to-back calls”.

The data by the month’s end was revealing.



Morning productivity measured

Since I have to have a morning cup of joe, all three traits start to climb after breakfast until they peak at around 9 AM. From there, the three diverge.

Energy is consistently high while motivation and focus start to dip. I suspect focus relates to a caffeine crash, while the other two to my morning schedule.

Why? Because my mornings are usually reserved for meetings. Whether its physical meetings where I hop from room to room and floor to floor, or virtual meetings where I talk to people over the phone or video.

This is my most physical part of the day, hence the high energy.

Yet, its also in those meetings that issues come up. Hearing bad news is never a good way to start the day. It’s a possible source of demotivation.


Continue reading “I measured my productivity for a month. Here’s what I learned.”

Migrating to a New Bullet Journal (plus a tour of the old one)

It was around June this year. A friend of mine, a fellow stationery enthusiast, asked if I’ve heard of the bullet journal. She’d seen my to-do lists and how obsessed I am with productivity. She thought the bullet journal was right up my alley.

She was right. Six months and one bullet journal later, it most certainly was is right up my alley.

Old and new bullet journals, side by side.

I’ve finally made it to the last page. So today, as I transition to a new notebook, I’ll go over the lessons I learned from my first bullet journal.


But first, what is a bullet journal?

The Bullet Journal is a customizable and forgiving organization system. It can be your to-do list, sketchbook, notebook, and diary, but most likely, it will be all of the above.

-“The System”, bulletjournal.com

Hang around long enough in any productivity site (Lifehacker, anyone?) and you’re bound to hear about the bullet journal, or BuJo for short. A quick search of #bulletjournal or #bujo through any social media platform greets us with images of neatly-inked notebook pages.

The creator’s site (above) is already a pretty accurate answer as to what a bullet journal is. So instead, I will define what a bullet journal is by how I use it:

For me, a bullet journal is a systematic to-do list.


Danna’s bullet journal: A love story

My love of to-do lists established, what the bullet journal offered was a way to take my to-do lists to the next level. It offered a simple way to track and migrate the tasks from my to-do lists, from one day to the next.

It does this through it’s namesake: the bullets.

Screenshot of key page (aka bullets)

The bullets also offered the option of writing down non-tasks without having to establish a separate “place” for them.

By changing the bullet, I can change the context of the text that comes after–Is it a task? An event? A note to self? This eliminated the need for having a separate journal and day planner.

These bullets were the primary reason why I knew the bullet journal system was going to work. It was easyIt was just extending something I already do (to-do lists), but offered a system for not a lot of extra effort.


What does my bullet journal look like?

To commemorate, I want to show off what my old bullet journal was like before I bid it goodbye.

My very first bullet journal, June to December 2016.

I use an A5 double-ring 70-sheet notebook from Muji. On the cover is a watercolor temporary tattoo I painted in class and a sticker label of my name. There’s a built-in elastic to keep the notebook in place.

First page of journal, and dot grid up close.

On the first page of my bujo is the original of the watercolor tattoo. The pages are cream-colored and made of recycled paper. I use dot grid because it strikes a nice balance: It has the structure of lined and grid notebooks, but with more freedom akin to blank sketch pads.

I stick to two colors of ink: black and pink. No special reason this time.


Lessons learned while migrating to a new bujo

As I migrate to a new bullet journal, I’ve had the chance to review the old one. I’ve had the chance to review what went well, and what I could have done better. I’ve listed down the lessons learned here.

Learn from my mistakes–so you won’t need to make them in case you ever decide to give bullet journaling a try.

1. Put the index at the back

If you follow the classic bullet journal format, it will tell you to allocate about 2-4 of the first few pages of your notebook for the index.

But, is two too few? Is four too much?

Index that ended up having two columns

In my case, I allotted two pages and ended up about two lines too short. As per above, I squeezed in the two lines into a second column.

Moving forward, I will do what books do: Put the index at the back. My entries and the index will then meet somewhere in the middle.

No more worries on how many pages to allot!

2. Use categories
Categories (see left)

When I started on the bujo, I had listed all the tasks along a single column like I would a to-do list. This was okay for the first few weeks, but as I got used to the bujo and started listing more and more tasks, the single list started to get confusing.

Respond to Brad’s email? About which?
And which report was I was supposed to update again?
Why did I have to do this again?

Etcetera. To resolve this, I added categories before the tasks to help give context. As a bonus, it complemented the Outlook categories I was already using.

3. Don’t be afraid of whitespace

In an attempt to save paper, I would sometimes put 2-3 unrelated topics on the same page.

This wreaked havoc on my index, especially when I would add something new to an existing topic and found I didn’t have enough space. Moving forward I’ll stick to 1-2 topics per page, never more.

4. Rapid log as often as you can

Something I realized while reviewing my old bullet journal: I underutilized its journaling capabilities. While I would occasionally note an event or thought, I found that for the most part I would still refer to emails and phone messages when trying to recall when did I do something.

If I had chronicled it properly in the first place, this shouldn’t have been a problem.

5. A bujo is not an art journal

One of my friends had started on her bullet journal around the same time as I did. She even bought a fancy notebook and a couple of expensive pens to go along with it. Six months later, and she still hasn’t gone past the first few pages.

I asked her why, and she said it’s because she didn’t want to ruin how it looked. 

Like myself, this friend frenziedly writes up a to-do list first thing in the morning.

Unlike myself, she doesn’t do this on her bullet journal. Instead she writes it on a memo pad we got as a freebie.

Not the bullet journal, she says. It’s too pretty for that.

Look up #bulletjournal online and you’ll see artsy pages decorated with calligraphy, collages, and illustrations. It’s easy to correlate that because other people make bujos an art journal, that it’s the proper way to do it.

It’s not.

The whole point of the bullet journal is customization. You make it work for you. If you like making art journals, go ahead.

I don’t. Rather, I can’t. Not in the morning when I’m gulping in my daily caffeine while rushing off to a meeting.

My use of the bullet journal is utilitarian. It’s just a bunch of to-do lists broken up by the occasional essay draft. It’s not pretty to look at, but it’s damn useful.




That’s the big lesson really.

The bullet journal offers a system. How you use that system is up to you.